How To Remove Limiting Beliefs

woman reading and looking at horizon pensive Our circumstances don't define us. Regardless of what happens in life, we always have the power to choose our attitude. And so what'south the departure between someone who remains hopeful despite experiencing groovy suffering and the person who stubs his or her toe and remains aroused the remainder of the day? The answer lies in the person'south thinking patterns.

Psychologists apply the term "cognitive distortions" to draw irrational, inflated thoughts or behavior that distort a person's perception of reality, usually in a negative way. Cerebral distortions are mutual but can be hard to recognize if yous don't know what to look for. Many occur as automated thoughts. They are then habitual that the thinker often doesn't realize he or she has the ability to alter them. Many grow to believe that'south just the fashion things are.

Cognitive distortions tin can take a serious toll on one's mental health, leading to increased stress, low, and anxiety. If left unchecked, these automatic thought patterns can become entrenched and may negatively influence the rational, logical fashion you make decisions.

Observe a Therapist

For those looking to meliorate their mental wellness past recognizing pesky cerebral distortions, we've compiled a list of xx mutual ones that may already exist distorting your perception of reality:

1. Black-and-White Thinking

A person with this dichotomous thinking pattern typically sees things in terms of either/or. Something is either good or bad, right or wrong, all or cipher. Black-and-white thinking fails to acknowledge that at that place are almost e'er several shades of gray that be between black and white. By seeing only 2 possible sides or outcomes to something, a person ignores the middle—and peradventure more than reasonable—footing.

2. Personalization

When engaging in this type of thinking, an individual tends to take things personally. He or she may attribute things that other people do equally the upshot of his or her ain actions or behaviors. This blazon of thinking also causes a person to blame himself or herself for external circumstances outside the person's control.

3. 'Should' Statements

Thoughts that include "should," "ought," or "must" are nearly always related to a cognitive distortion. For example: "I should accept arrived to the coming together earlier," or, "I must lose weight to be more attractive." This type of thinking may induce feelings of guilt or shame. "Should" statements besides are mutual when referring to others in our lives. These thoughts may become something like, "He should have called me before," or, "She ought to thank me for all the help I've given her." Such thoughts tin pb a person to experience frustration, acrimony, and bitterness when others fail to meet unrealistic expectations. No matter how hard we wish to sometimes, nosotros cannot command the behavior of another, so thinking near what others should do serves no healthy purpose.

iv. Catastrophizing

This occurs when a person sees any unpleasant occurrence equally the worst possible outcome. A person who is catastrophizing might fail an exam and immediately call up he or she has likely failed the unabridged course. A person may non have even taken the exam yet and already believe he or she will fail—assuming the worst, or preemptively catastrophizing.

5. Magnifying

With this type of cerebral baloney, things are exaggerated or blown out of proportion, though not quite to the extent of catastrophizing. It is the existent-life version of the old saying, "Making a mountain out of a molehill."

6. Minimizing

The same person who experiences the magnifying baloney may minimize positive events. These distortions sometimes occur in conjunction with each other. A person who distorts reality by minimizing may think something like, "Yes, I got a raise, but information technology wasn't very large and I'grand still not very proficient at my task."

7. Mindreading

This type of thinker may assume the role of psychic and may recall he or she knows what someone else thinks or feels. The person may recollect he or she knows what another person thinks despite no external confirmation that his or her supposition is truthful.

8. Fortune Telling

A fortune-telling-type thinker tends to predict the future, and commonly foresees a negative result. Such a thinker arbitrarily predicts that things will plow out poorly. Before a concert or movie, you might hear him or her say, "I simply know that all the tickets will be sold out when we get there."

9. Overgeneralization

When overgeneralizing, a person may come to a determination based on one or 2 unmarried events, despite the fact reality is too complex to make such generalizations. If a friend misses a lunch appointment, this doesn't mean he or she will always fail to proceed commitments. Overgeneralizing statements often include the words "ever," "never," "every," or "all."

10. Discounting the Positive

This extreme class of all-or-cipher thinking occurs when a person discounts positive information about a performance, issue, or experience and sees only negative aspects. A person engaging in this type of distortion might condone any compliments or positive reinforcement he or she receives.

Idea patterns can exist inverse through a process referred to in cerebral therapy as cognitive restructuring. The idea behind it is that past adjusting our automatic thoughts, we are able to influence our emotions and behaviors.

11. Filtering

This cerebral baloney, similar to discounting the positive, occurs when a person filters out information, negative or positive. For case, a person may expect at his or her feedback on an assignment in school or at piece of work and exclude positive notes to focus on one critical annotate.

12. Labeling

This distortion, a more severe blazon of overgeneralization, occurs when a person labels someone or something based on i experience or event. Instead of believing that he or she made a mistake, people engaging in this blazon of thinking might automatically characterization themselves equally failures.

thirteen. Blaming

This is the opposite of personalization. Instead of seeing everything as your fault, all blame is put on someone or something else.

xiv. Emotional Reasoning

Mistaking one'south feelings for reality is emotional reasoning. If this blazon of thinker feels scared, there must exist real danger. If this type of thinker feels stupid, then to him or her this must be truthful. This type of thinking can be severe and may manifest every bit obsessive compulsion. For example, a person may experience muddy even though he or she has showered twice within the by hour.

15. Always Being 'Right'

This thinking pattern causes a person to internalize his or her opinions as facts and fails to consider the feelings of the other person in a debate or discussion. This cognitive distortion can make it hard to form and sustain healthy relationships.

16. Self-Serving Bias

A person experiencing cocky-serving bias may aspect all positive events to his or her personal graphic symbol while seeing any negative events every bit outside of his or her control. This design of thinking may cause a person to refuse to admit mistakes or flaws and to alive in a distorted reality where he or she tin can practice no wrong.

17. 'Heaven's Reward' Fallacy

In this pattern of thinking, a person may expect divine rewards for his or her sacrifices. People experiencing this distortion tend to put their interests and feelings bated in hopes that they will exist rewarded for their selflessness later, just they may become biting and aroused if the reward is never presented.

eighteen. Fallacy of Alter

This baloney assumes that other people must modify their behavior in club for us to be happy. This manner of thinking is usually considered selfish because it insists, for example, that other people change their schedule to accommodate yours or that your partner shouldn't wear his or her favorite t-shirt because you don't like it.

19. Fallacy of Fairness

This fallacy assumes that things have to be measured based on fairness and equality, when in reality things often don't always work that fashion. An example of the trap this type of thinking sets is when it justifies infidelity if a person's partner has cheated.

xx. Control Fallacy

Someone who sees things as internally controlled may put himself or herself at mistake for events that are truly out of the person's control, such as another person'southward happiness or beliefs. A person who sees things as externally controlled might blame his or her boss for poor work performance.

How to Alter Thinking Patterns and Cerebral Distortions

For many, ane or more than of these cerebral distortions will wait familiar. You may fall into one or more of these traps or know someone who does. The good news is that cerebral distortions don't have to weigh yous down like an anchor.

Idea patterns can exist inverse through a procedure referred to in cognitive therapy as cognitive restructuring. The idea behind it is that by adjusting our automated thoughts, we are able to influence our emotions and behaviors. This is the basis of several pop forms of therapy, including cerebral behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT).

If you experience that one or more of the above cognitive distortions is contributing to feelings of anxiety, depression, or other mental health issues, we encourage y'all to consider finding a qualified therapist you lot trust to piece of work with y'all and assist transform your negative thoughts and behavior into empowering affirmations that inspire and uplift you.

References:

Beck, Aaron T. (1976). Cognitive therapies and emotional disorders. New York: New American Library.
Beck, Aaron T. (1972). Depression; Causes and Treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Printing.
Tagg, John (1996). Cognitive Distortions. Retrieved from http://daphne.palomar.edu/jtagg/cds.htm#cogdis

The preceding article was solely written by the author named higher up. Any views and opinions expressed are not necessarily shared by GoodTherapy.org. Questions or concerns about the preceding article can be directed to the author or posted as a comment below.

Please fill out all required fields to submit your message.

Invalid E-mail Address.

Please confirm that you are human being.

Get out a Comment